Recently, the ‘Price Oolong’ incident occurred on Apple’s official website in China. Products with more than 1,000 yuan can be purchased for one or two hundred yuan, so many consumers place orders to snap up.
But before the goods arrived, consumers received text messages or emails from Apple and were notified to cut orders.
As per the latest news, Apple and is currently looking for users who have been hacked. Apple’s cut orders are flawed.
According to the provisions of the ‘Contract Law’, the termination of the contract includes statutory termination and agreed on termination.
This case is of course an agreed termination, but the termination of the agreement also needs to be done step by step in accordance with the contract law. Judging from the Apple notifications I have seen, there are at least two flaws:
First, Apple did not provide evidence to prove that the price was indeed a wrong price. It only made a written statement.
It is estimated that Apple will provide corresponding evidence only in court, and it may not be able to prove it.
Second, the wording used by Apple is ‘the price is problematic’ and ‘the price is inaccurate’, but it does not clearly indicate that this is a ‘wrong pricing’.
The law is strict, and the price problem the wrong pricing, the price is not accurate ≠ the wrong This notice is likely to be deemed unqualified.
(Via)
